"Separating the issues of issues of money and Treatment"

this may be a bit of naive

but I have always wondered at this phrase above or its semantics

To me the CA way unites the issues of money and treatment
at least in consciousness

you get what you paid for at the door
its upfront and affordable
it seems often clearer for both the stuckee and the sticker
affordabilty=effectiveness

there is not the odd valuation of fees based on seniority or perceived skill level or website construction

there isn't the foggy minded shakedown at the end of the treatment for the stuckee

perhaps performance/ return anxiety for the sticker

nor the pleasant separate feeling prolonged for either party in the corporate moneyhandling scheme

what gets separated?

please discuss and unite

jimmyjabs